Before a horde of replies come in I thought I'd answer quickly:
Fruition is not mentioned in the Suttas
So called "in seeing just the seen" is really such a minor teaching of the Buddha, probably mentioned only once in one major source
The Progress of Insight is not mentioned in the Suttas
The POI of the commentaries is radically different from the one used here, more related to insight, not phenomenology
Sotapannas are inapable of Wrong Views as Wrong Views lead to hell, sotapannas cannot be born in hell, there are a variety of Wrong Views here
The Unconsciousness event may be demeritorious, but might be related to the Unconscious Devas in the Brahma realm
Models of Enlightenment in the Suttas directly contradict the ones here
Morality plays a prominent role in the Suttas (Wrong View again)
Magick is supported here, Magick is against Sila in the Suttas
Sotapannas can only follow the Buddha
Limited Action Models are supported by the Suttas
The unravelling of the self is done at first path, not fourth
Limited Emotional range models are supported by the suttas
Finally there were many HERETICAL TEACHERS at the time of the Buddha who had similar teachings to the Buddha, many were said to go to hell (Purana Kassapa, Mahavira?) google if interested, similar thing is happening here, possibly
Karma and other mythologies play an important role in the suttas but are discarded here
Vipassana is not really mentioned in the suttas (I know weird right?)
Afterlife exists in suttas, not here
The notion that only an anagami experiences nirodha samapatti is commentarial, not suttic, furthermore the nirodha samapatti of the DhO may not be the nirodha samapatti of the Tipitaka
Anagamis experience no ill will or sensual desire WHATSOEVER, not mostly no sensual desire and ill will with some vestiges of shadows left behind or whatever
Please check out the characteristics:
http://dhammawiki.com/index.php?title=Sotapanna
He is incapable of nine actions: treating any sankhara as permanent, treating any sankhara as pleasurable, treating any dhamma as self, killing his mother, father or an arahant, causing bleeding in a Tathagata with evil intent, splitting the Sangha, or going over to another teacher. (Bahudhatuka Sutta MN. 115)
He is incapable of concealing any bodily, verbal or mental transgression. (Ratanasutta Sn. 235)
He is incapable of living without reverence for the Buddha, the Dhamma, the Sangha, and the training. Nor can he embrace any of the 62 wrong views or take an eighth birth. (Panhama-abhabbannhana Sutta AN. iii. 438-9)
He is fixed unshakably in the True Dhamma, is incapable of backsliding (to being a worlding), his future dukkha is finite, he has attained to knowledge not common to worldlings, cause and causally arisen dhammas are seen rightly by him. (Anisansa Sutta AN. iii. 441)
Anyone honestly fulfill these critieria?