Hi Mitsuaki David Chi,
Mitsuaki David Chi:
OK, I hope this can be considered DN material.
In The Life of Shabkar: The Autobiography of a Tibetan Yogin, Shabkar's guru tells him that he has to give up these three things (wealth, society, and food), in order to truly live a spiritual life of a bodhisattva.
Can anybody comment on their experiences with relinquishment and renunciation in these areas? Maybe they are not needed for insight practice, but are needed to reach the higher bhumis?
For me, wealth and society seem much easier than food. I mean, sweet food tastes so GOOD!
Specifically, what is your experience with eating on longer retreats? There were several instances during my last retreat in which I overate and felt very miserable/shameful afterwards. It's like the hungry ghosts just swoop in and completely take hold of the body. Maybe I was restraining too much? Do you eat only a specific amount no matter what? Do you eat things you like? Do you notice desire for things you like and not eat them? This was a big issue during this last retreat....
Thanks for all your support.
Be Happy!
Bhikkhu Anālayo includes a table (page 200) in his book,
Satipaṭṭhāna, the Direct Path to Realization, Windhorse Publications, 2003, outlining hindering factors and means to dissolve them as written in the Papancasudani ("Clarifier of Proliferation"), a commentary to the Majjhima Nikaya: "Moderation in food" is one of the factors that tends to the obstacle of hindering/binding sensual desire and "lessening food intake" is a factor that tends to the hindering sloth (mental aspect) and torpor (physical aspect).
On retreat awhile back I took up "moderation in food" eating 1 - 1.5 meals a day (one full meal and sometimes a salad). It is very beneficial for developing meditative stabilization/proficiency. It also is excellent in regards to knowing experientially the aggregates and causes of suffering (personal and global manifestation).
After one gradually takes up the practice of food moderation, meditative stabilization improves (and the repetition of stable meditation builds meditative proficiency/fluency), and this greatly improving conditions for insight.
One easily may fall back to non-moderation, then gently return to trying (without ill-will or aversion to the "falling off the wagon"), until this moderation practice is also stabilized. It is so obviously healthful and comfortable that after the first few days, one naturally keeps going back to it, but without force, with friendliness and friendly effort and awareness of its benefits.
It is a luxury to chose this kind of practice, too. For a sentient that has known a lot of deprivation, it is very natural that that sentient may be compelled to seek every maximum of indulgence before they consider studying their any craving, and moderating the consumption: like any addiction whatsoever it often takes experiential learning of the stress and suffering that results from exaggerating a pleasure-gratification.
So, it is useful to have not a mind of "deprivation", but to approach this with the mind of friendliness to one's effort, mindfulness of the arising and passing aggregates, patience, curiosity and awareness of the good fortune of even being able to consider this moderation, that one has the conditions of "lessened craving" and "craves less" and is interesting in severing the bond of craving.
Best wishes