| | Hi Haquan,
Careful there with copyrighted words. It's "Theohumanity©"! There may be good reasons for coining a new word and then claiming very tight control over it, with "certified facilitators" to facilitate it... Theohumanity? Anthroposophy reloaded? Hmmm. Three bodies, eh?
So this is my initial impression: slap new words on some of Steiner's ideas, control the vocabulary, build a sales force.
Scratching a few monolayers deeper, this seems to be solidly on the "True Self" side of the spectrum. While completely neutral itself, combined with the commercial / tight control overtones, this readily fits certain prejudices I hold.
So what is it all about? "Enheartenment, a newly defined state of the summit of human spiritual maturity beyond enlightenment that has been heretofore unattainable".
Big claims. Here's how it works: "Theohumanity demystifies the state of enlightenment and shows why Nondual-enlightened teachers who inappropriately elevate enlightenment to the overly significant spiritual proportions they do have so little to offer others in terms of real change"
I can't help myself, but this seems to be along the lines: "The unrealistic models of enlightenment, such as the limited emotional range model, really aren't unrealistic, it's just that they aren't about *enlightenment* but about *enheartenment*". How they become less unrealistic by changing the name didn't become clear to me from my admittedly limited reading.
Wow, this turned into a rant! To mellow up things, I'll say this is just my first impression, and I'm eager to see more balanced reactions.
Cheers, Florian |