Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity

thumbnail
Jeff Grove, modified 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 6:56 AM
Created 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 6:56 AM

Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity

Posts: 310 Join Date: 8/24/09 Recent Posts
I have been reading up on Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity . The core of his theory involve the concept of the phenomenal self-model (PSM), and the phenomenal model of the intentionality-relation (PMIR) and are detailed in the following 2 books


Being No One: The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity ( reviewed at http://www.human-nature.com/nibbs/03/metzinger.html)

and the Ego Tunnel (reviewed at http://www.naturalism.org/metzinger.htm)

A large part of his first book can be read here -
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=COYWQ_7Nla4C&dq=Being+No+One:+The+Self-Model+Theory+of+Subjectivity+download&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=noWdTOGAFJa0cN-vkcoJ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CCQQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q&f=false

More info can be found at http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Self_models

Has anyone else looked into this work?

Thanks
Jeff
thumbnail
Jeff Grove, modified 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 3:41 PM
Created 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 3:38 PM

RE: Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity

Posts: 310 Join Date: 8/24/09 Recent Posts
Does the PMIR describe Dan's Attention wave process?


Metzinger mentioned in Being No One about the profound personal and social consequences that follow from fully naturalizing ourselves

On Metzinger’s view, the self – the feeling of being a mental me in charge of the physical body – is a module within consciousness activated by your brain’s neural processing. The self is categorically not some substantial, essential invariant entity, like a soul, spirit or homunculus. As he emphasizes, there are no such things as substantial selves.
Consciousness is always an experienced unity; it’s always now, that is, temporally present; it convinces us that it’s real, not a representation; it transcends our ability to describe its basic elements, so is ineffable in some respects; and it has come about via evolution, thus is natural and adaptive.

from http://www.naturalism.org/metzinger.htm
Conscious experience is, he suggests, a biological data format that, by generating a subjective reality for the organism, supports adaptive behavior that would otherwise be impossible:

It is easy to overlook the causal relevance of this first evolutionary step, the fundamental computational goal of conscious experience. It allowed animals to represent explicitly the fact that something is actually the case. A transparent world-model lets you discover that something is really out there, and by integrating your portrait of the world with the subjective Now, it lets you grasp the fact that the world is present. This step opened up a new level of complexity. Thus, having a global world-model is a new way of processing information about the world in a highly integrated manner. Every conscious thought, every bodily sensation, every sound and every sight, every experience of empathy or of sharing the goals of another human being makes a different class of facts available for the adaptive, flexible, and selective form of processing that only conscious experience can provide. (p. 59)
D C, modified 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 9:30 PM
Created 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 9:30 PM

RE: Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity

Posts: 28 Join Date: 8/23/09 Recent Posts
Jeff

I'm not sure where it is you're wanting to go with Metzinger but here's some further, rather critical discussion of him by two of my favorite thinkers. Take a moment to read the letters also.

http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2010/08/02/harman-responds-to-shaviro/

http://doctorzamalek2.wordpress.com/2010/08/03/gary-williams-responds/


Damon
thumbnail
Jeff Grove, modified 13 Years ago at 9/27/10 3:21 AM
Created 13 Years ago at 9/26/10 11:35 PM

RE: Thomas Metzinger' s Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity

Posts: 310 Join Date: 8/24/09 Recent Posts
Hi Damon

Thankyou for the reply and the references.

I started reading the book (Being No One) over the weekend and his theory is similar as to what I have been discovering via contemplation.


For instance from one of the links you provided if I am reading correctly these appear to be critizing Metzinger based on quote "present the ‘feeble’ argument that the self is not a thing, but rather, a function".


Here is a statement from the book Being No One that I found interesting

"The dynamic content of the phenomenal self-model is the content of the conscious self: Your current bodily sensations, your present emotional situation plus all the contents of your phenomenally experienced cognitive processing. They are constituents of your PSM. All those properties of your experiential self, to which you can now direct your attention, form the content of your current PSM. This PSM is not a thing, but an integrated process."



Take the Buddhas skandhas, these could be described as a PSM within this Theory. Metzingers PMIR offers a good explanation of what is discovered experientially by the attention wave. The combination of PSM and PMIR, leads to subjectivity, i.e., to the experience of being in the world under a first-person perspective, of being someone who acts, perceives, and thinks autonomously and flexibly - the self. Both the content and the reflexive mechanism


When investigating "How am I experiencing this moment of being alive"

There may be a visceral response but its this reflexive mechanism, consciousness of the experience, ("I am my feelings and my feelings are me") that separates me (creates me, is me) from this moment.


Appreciated
Jeff

Breadcrumb