Thanks so much for all the replies! There is so much here to go through. Some super quick replies:
Paul: Thanks for sharing your experiences about the ear ringing. That is super helpful. If it's a sign I'm doing things well, that's great news. In fact, everything in Paul's reply is super helpful and I am working on processing all of it.
Shargrol brings up my age. Thanks man! I don't think of myself as being old! (Need a "pretend angry but also rueful" emoticon here.) I take your point. I feel like I'm much less "set in my ways" than most people my age ... so I'm hopeful.
Linda: I have read large chunks of MCTB2. I think I'm barely on the charts at this time. I have had strong experiences that seem very "Mind & Body" ... and in fact as I re-read that section, it's obvious that I'm doing Mind & Body stuff every time I sit these days. The "Cause & Effect" stuff, though, is pretty rudimentary in me right now. So I'm pretty sure Fear is a ways off in the future. But obviously self-diagnosis is hard!
Rhubarb asks if I
need to go forward. And ... I don't know for sure but I suspect so. I kind of think by asking this question on this particular forum, I'm kind of inviting the answer "Hell YES you need to go forward." If I wanted another answer, I'd likely have asked somewhere else.
Right on Track asks why I am so committed to practice. My first answer is what I've learned to say about a lot of things about myself: I don't know! A second answer is, I have free time and also a somewhat obsessive personality ... and also meditation is amazingly cool. I taught myself Spanish over a few years, and now I'm teaching myself meditation, and maybe this is a thing that I continue to do for the rest of my life, or maybe it gets replaced? Meditation definitely
feels like a permanent thing that will be with me for the rest of my life, and I have a hard time imagining wanting to live without it ... but who knows? A third answer is: I have always been interested in religion, I did a freaking Ph.D. in Christian theology & ethics many years ago, and Buddhism was always interesting to me as well as a theoretical thing when I was in my 20s, but at that time it seemed very alien and not something that was realistic for me to even consider as a part of my own life.
Shargrol asks what is good about practice. I have had some of the typical benefits of practice: it's made me more patient, more aware, a better husband, a better friend, a nicer person to be around. I have a more accurate sense of what sort of a creature I am. When someone asks "Why did you do that unpleasant thing?" I can more honestly and realistically reflect on the question, and often the answer is not "I had a good reason you jerk!" but rather "I honestly and truly don't know" or "I was not practicing good awareness and I let my emotions run away with me" -- and in either case "I truly wish I hadn't done that and I'm sorry." I notice the world more, and find joy in it, and dwell less often in my own endless circle of boring thoughts. Things like that.
Rhubarb says: "You can also be pretty sure that no serious problems will occur." Right on Track concurs: "my impression is that those unhappy occurences happen to people who are not fully integrated psychologically before they start meditation." Well: this is what I very much
want to be true! But Daniel Ingram, in various interviews, seems to say it's not true. I listened to his talk with Willoughby Britton, where the interviewers more or less said "Isn't it true that only people who bring a messed-up perspective to meditation will experience these problems?" and Willoughby said "No, it's worse than that, and here's why ..." and then Daniel said "No, it's even worse than Willoughby said, and here's why...." Basically, they both said that even people who seem pretty ordinary and with it, professional people with successful lives, can have serious problems that put their careers and relationships at risk. In another podcast, someone asks Daniel if he thinks everyone should meditate and he says, basically, hell no, because there are real risks involved. He compares it to the use of drugs in an emergency medicine context. He says (paraphrasing): "we tell patients, 'here are the ways this medicine can help you, and here are the things it can do that are bad and dangerous,' and that's why we have informed consent." (The same interviewer, earlier in the podcast, said something positive about use of hardcore psychedelic drugs, and Daniel gave basically the same answer.) Shargrol seems to agree with Willoughby & Daniel: every meditator is taking a serious risk and there are no guarantees. (Do I have that right?)
This is where the rubber hits the road. I am honestly not scared (not
too scared) of going through some suffering periods, bad experiences, mental or emotional or physical pain along the way. What I'm scared of is blowing up my life: doing something that does permanent damage.
I'm hoping someone can tell me something like the following: "It is vanishingly unlikely that the insights or the painful stages of the path will cause you to toss aside your deepest commitments." But I feel like awakening is like a Forrest Gump style box of chocolates and there's no way to know what will happen.
Thanks again to all of you!
And please, anybody else with anything to share, no matter how minimal, I would be very grateful for your thoughts.