RE: Identity-view and the fetter model.

Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 6/24/24 3:40 AM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 6/23/24 4:51 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 7/11/24 8:41 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 9/23/24 6:23 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Chris M 9/23/24 6:19 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 9/29/24 1:29 AM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 10/3/24 11:58 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 10/4/24 2:49 PM
Mantra of the Day Jim Smith 10/28/24 11:25 AM
RE: Mantra of the Day Chris M 10/28/24 11:33 AM
RE: Mantra of the Day shargrol 10/28/24 2:14 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 11/16/24 4:34 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 11/16/24 7:10 AM
Mantra of the Day Jim Smith 11/30/24 9:59 PM
Mantra of the Day Jim Smith 12/26/24 10:11 PM
Identity-view and the fetter model. Jim Smith 12/29/24 2:56 PM
RE: Identity-view and the fetter model. Jim Smith 1/6/25 1:09 PM
RE: Identity-view and the fetter model. Papa Che Dusko 1/6/25 6:41 PM
RE: Identity-view and the fetter model. Jim Smith 1/11/25 4:47 AM
RE: Identity-view and the fetter model. Olivier S 1/6/25 7:28 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/7/25 3:55 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Papa Che Dusko 1/7/25 7:27 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/10/25 2:17 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Chris M 1/10/25 2:19 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Papa Che Dusko 1/10/25 3:11 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Chris M 1/10/25 4:41 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Papa Che Dusko 1/11/25 10:15 AM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/8/25 9:49 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/10/25 6:25 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/10/25 6:46 PM
RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4 Jim Smith 1/10/25 7:07 PM
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 7 Months ago at 6/24/24 3:40 AM
Created 7 Months ago at 6/12/24 10:57 PM

Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
My views on meditation and mindfulness are explained here: 
https://ncu9nc.blogspot.com/p/meditation.html


Links I think are helpful:

Links I'm often looking up put here so I can find them easily...
​​​​​​​
MCTB2 Links 

100% capture
https://www.mctb.org/mctb2/table-of-contents/part-vi-my-spiritual-quest/70-around-the-world-and-finding-home/the-second-mbmc-retreat/

never destabilized
https://www.mctb.org/mctb2/table-of-contents/part-vi-my-spiritual-quest/70-around-the-world-and-finding-home/vimuttimagga-the-path-of-freedom/

You know, some people are arahants only on retreat.
https://www.mctb.org/mctb2/table-of-contents/part-vi-my-spiritual-quest/70-around-the-world-and-finding-home/wobble-and-fall/

https://www.mctb.org/mctb2/table-of-contents/part-v-awakening/37-models-of-the-stages-of-awakening/the-theravada-four-path-model/

Daniel:
Utter centerlessness: no watcher, no sense of a watcher, no subtle watcher, no possibility of a watcher.
https://www.dharmaoverground.org/discussion/-/message_boards/message/2715189#_com_liferay_message_boards_web_portlet_MBPortlet_message_2718243

Previous practice logs:
​​​​​​​
#3 is here
https://www.dharmaoverground.org/discussion/-/message_boards/message/25556111

# 2, is here: 
https://www.dharmaoverground.org/discussion/-/message_boards/message/23406442

# 1 is here: 
https://www.dharmaoverground.org/discussion/-/message_boards/message/22843214#_com_liferay_message_boards_web_portlet_MBPortlet_message_8496517
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 7 Months ago at 6/23/24 4:51 PM
Created 7 Months ago at 6/23/24 4:51 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
I have been meditating a little bit differently lately.

There is a feeling of non-attachment I notice with metta or jhana's. I have been isolating that and just meditating on that feeling with just a tad of the elevated mood that comes from metta or jhana's. It facilitates disengaging the ego.


I've also been thinking of a phrase "Being no one, having nothing" I read in The Magic of Awareness. It's a good compliment to the above, when done with an upbeat mood. I think it's not something you understand through reason, it's something that works into the unconscious mind when  you are in a meditative state, (ie it doesn't work through the default network). The meaning is something you feel, if you know from experience that ego clinging is the cause of suffering you can understand/feel that being no one and having nothing would end suffering.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 6 Months ago at 7/11/24 8:41 PM
Created 6 Months ago at 7/11/24 8:41 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
I posted this on reddit and I thought others here might be interested...

For me, the thing that has the most obvious effect of creating the sense of a self is the sense of purpose or agency. The feeling of having and acting with will creates the sense of self.

If you observe the mind casually and you see a thought -> emotion -> impulse -> action  - we assume (feel like) we are an entity reacting by exercising will. 

But if you watch the mind more closely, you see that those events are the result of impersonal cause and effect (not intention) and are produced by unconscious processes before they rise into awareness. It tells you the idea of having conscious will is an assumption or an opinion that might not be correct (depending on how you define terms). (And the feeling of being an entity with will is just another feeling arising from unconscious processes.)

The feeling of being an observer is similar, it is an assumption we make things that arises to consciousness from unconscious processes. 

A better way to explain the self would be to say it is a collection of loosely connected unconscious processes interacting through cause and effect that sometimes work at cross purposes (for example craving rich food while being afraid of gaining weight). 

What we usually think of as the self, an entity observing and exercising will, is really just an image, a portrait of what we believe about our self ie the self-image. We mistake an image of a thing for the actual thing. Actually most people already know a lot about this they just don't connect the dots. We know we get distracted when we try to focus on something - we don't control our thoughts. We have unpleasant emotions we don't want - we don't control our emotions. We have impulses that are often unhelpful, we don't control our impulses or actions. Our sense of our role in life changes from situation to situation, student, child, parent, employee, supervisor. Our sense of our personal characteristics changes with our emotions: pride, shame, winner, loser, etc. The feeling of being changes with physical sensations - hot, cold, pleasure, pain, etc. The self image is constantly changing, coming into existence when we have thoughts of self, and vanishing when we are absorbed in external perception.

Quieting the mind, slowing down it's activity, through meditation - so you can see clearly what it is doing - will help you see this. Try to see how the sense of agency you feel arises from your assumptions about things happening through impersonal cause and effect. The sense of being a "self" is something that is caused by assumptions we make. It really is an opinion that isn't right or wrong - but you understand it in a very different way when you understand the assumptions you are making and why you make them.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 4 Months ago at 9/23/24 6:23 PM
Created 4 Months ago at 9/23/24 6:16 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Nirvana is in the present moment, not in the future.

If you want awakening, if you want nirvana, stop expecting it or hoping for it sometime in the future and start looking for it in the present moment.

Consider all the things you want or fear in the future, or regret about the past, or things that you want, or like, or don't like now - you have to let go of all that because nirvana is in the present moment.  

Look for non attachment in the present moment not in the future. Try to find it now. Wherever you are, whatever you're doing, that's where you need to look for it. It's there, in your mind, right now. Stop clinging.
thumbnail
Chris M, modified 4 Months ago at 9/23/24 6:19 PM
Created 4 Months ago at 9/23/24 6:19 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 5578 Join Date: 1/26/13 Recent Posts
It's all happening now, right? The future is just thoughts now, as is the past. So there's just here-now all the time.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 3 Months ago at 9/29/24 1:29 AM
Created 3 Months ago at 9/29/24 1:04 AM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
You probably feel comfortable with your opinions, what you like and dislike, you don't feel like you've been brainwashed.
But what you don't realize is to what extent your opinions have been determined by outside forces trying to influence you.

This video is from three years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKIBPRse4e8

social media is using psychology to get you addicted to the news
sugar is addicting
pharmaceuticals are addicting
porn is addicting - encourages isolation 
video games are addicting

people mostly live alone, they face these attacks alone

the most powerful people in the world today are the people writing the algorithms for twitter and facebook and instagram
they are rewriting people's brains, they are programming the culture

because internet companies take sides in politics (like newspaper publishers, unlike telephone companies) they open themselves to government regulation
which means eventually they will be controlled by the government.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 3 Months ago at 10/3/24 11:58 PM
Created 3 Months ago at 10/3/24 11:57 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
In a previous log I wrote about Michael Singer's analogy of mindfulness to lucid dreams that he discussed in his book "The Untethered Soul".

In a typical dream you think it is real, but in a lucid dream you know you are dreaming.

Mindfulness is like that in a way, when you are not mindful, you are caught up in thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and senses of self and no-self, like when you are watching a movie and so caught up in it you forget where you are. But when you are mindful, you are aware of all those elements of consciousness and you don't get carried away and forget yourself and become immersed in the reality they reflect, like when you know you are watching a movie. 

But you can also take the analogy further. If you consider that thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and sense of self and no-self, arise from unconscious processes, you don't consciously create, choose or control them. Then being lucid means you recognize from moment to moment that the reality those elements of consciousness is not you or yours.

​​​​​​​Each moment of consciousness is like a dream, it can be like a typical dream where you accept it implicitly as reality, or it can be like a lucid dream where you know thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and senses of self and no-self, are not you or yours - not something you created, chose, or controll.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 3 Months ago at 10/4/24 2:49 PM
Created 3 Months ago at 10/4/24 2:47 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Jim Smith
In a previous log I wrote about Michael Singer's analogy of mindfulness to lucid dreams that he discussed in his book "The Untethered Soul".

In a typical dream you think it is real, but in a lucid dream you know you are dreaming.

Mindfulness is like that in a way, when you are not mindful, you are caught up in thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and senses of self and no-self, like when you are watching a movie and so caught up in it you forget where you are. But when you are mindful, you are aware of all those elements of consciousness and you don't get carried away and forget yourself and become immersed in the reality they reflect, like when you know you are watching a movie. 

But you can also take the analogy further. If you consider that thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and sense of self and no-self, arise from unconscious processes, you don't consciously create, choose or control them. Then being lucid means you recognize from moment to moment that the reality those elements of consciousness is not you or yours.

​​​​​​​Each moment of consciousness is like a dream, it can be like a typical dream where you accept it implicitly as reality, or it can be like a lucid dream where you know thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences, and senses of self and no-self, are not you or yours - not something you created, chose, or controll.


I often find there are bits of things I know as disconnected pieces of information until I see the relationships between them

...

and connect the dots
...

I like to say, "it's not the situation that is the problem it's your reaction to the situation that is the problem".

But one can go further, the reaction is not even yours. You didn't create it, choose it, and you don't control it.

So when something doesn't go the way you would like it to, instead of obsessing over the situation, getting caught up in your thoughts and emotions and losing mindfulness, it is better to recognize the real problem, the cause of suffering, is not the situation, the problem is your reaction to the situation AND accepting that reaction as yours.

If you are mindful, and understand you don't create, choose, or control your reactions, the unpleasant emotions, the mental anguish, the suffering, is not yours, then you can let go more easily and stay mindful, and respond with reason and compassion rather than selfish emotions.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 11:25 AM
Created 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 11:15 AM

Mantra of the Day

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Mantra of the day:

"You can't have everything you want."

When dukkha arises, it is usually because we want something we don't have or don't like something we do have. We have the feeling that something is not right.

But if you remind yourself that you can't have everything you want, you change the sense of the situation from something going wrong to everything is the way it is supposed to be: you can't have everything you want.

I find it makes letting go much easier.

I still feel wanting and disliking, but there is no longer a reason for clinging, so those feelings arise and fade without causing much trouble. The meaning of those feelings changes from "something is wrong" to "everything is normal".

It doesn't mean you ignore problems, it means you can respond with compassion and reason instead of selfish emotions.
thumbnail
Chris M, modified 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 11:33 AM
Created 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 11:33 AM

RE: Mantra of the Day

Posts: 5578 Join Date: 1/26/13 Recent Posts
And there's this spin on the situation by the Rolling Stones:
​​​​​​​
You can’t always get what you want
You can’t always get what you want
You can’t always get what you want
But if you try sometimes, well, you just might find
You get what you need
shargrol, modified 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 2:14 PM
Created 2 Months ago at 10/28/24 2:14 PM

RE: Mantra of the Day

Posts: 2812 Join Date: 2/8/16 Recent Posts
Jim Smith
Mantra of the day:

"You can't have everything you want."

When dukkha arises, it is usually because we want something we don't have or don't like something we do have. We have the feeling that something is not right.

But if you remind yourself that you can't have everything you want, you change the sense of the situation from something going wrong to everything is the way it is supposed to be: you can't have everything you want.

I find it makes letting go much easier.

I really like this. I had a similar expression I would say to myself: "don't need your wants". 
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 2 Months ago at 11/16/24 4:34 PM
Created 2 Months ago at 11/15/24 1:43 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
In response to a video posted to the Shinzen facebook group I wrote:
I have said nirvana is not something you find in the future it is something you find in the present moment. And I have also felt that looking for stages of insight and of awakening is an obstacle to making progress. I have also doubted the idea that awakening eliminates the need to work through emotional baggage.

I think Delson would agree with this. He says:

"What I believe now is that Liberation is possible in every moment and that people are already liberated. Underneath all of that the mind is already liberated. Underneath all the subconscious trauma underneath all the unconscious desires underneath all of underneath all the conscious beckoning and and chasing around and looking and seeking if the Mind were just to remain still for a moment all of that disappears. And in that moment the mind is liberated."

"Because to Define Awakening as anything creates conflict in the mind because now there's a goal to achieve."
​​​​​​​
"I don't believe that Awakening just totally erases the shadows of the unconscious the traumas of the subconscious. I believe there's still work to be done there."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMwZWQo36cY&t=3006s

50:06
"I would redefine Awakening as a process of going through that Journey. Going through, you know, the pain and the sorrow. Maybe you start off with that. Going through the process of meditation going through the process of insight and understanding. And then there comes a point where all of that becomes your reality. But then there's a call back to home where you still have to deal with all of the inner stuff that might still be there in the subconscious.

I don't believe that Awakening just totally erases the shadows of the unconscious the traumas of the subconscious. I believe there's still work to be done there. And even if, let's say in an Ideal World, somebody was to do that, does that mean that they're awakened? No that's not how I would Define Awakening. Because to Define Awakening as anything creates conflict in the mind because now there's a goal to achieve.
​​​​​​​
What I believe now is that Liberation is possible in every moment and that people are already liberated. Underneath all of that the mind is already liberated. Underneath all the subconscious trauma underneath all the unconscious desires underneath all of underneath all the conscious beckoning and and chasing around and looking and seeking if the Mind were just to remain still for a moment all of that disappears. And in that moment the mind is liberated. And I think then once that realization comes, the task at hand is to see that as much as one can see without without ignoring or trying to gloss over the darker aspects of the mind."
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 2 Months ago at 11/16/24 7:10 AM
Created 2 Months ago at 11/16/24 7:10 AM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
I wrote this for a different forum, but it's relevant here because it can assist in letting go of attachments and aversions.  Not everyone will relate to this but some people might find it helpful:
When you feel disappointment over things you want but don't have, or situations you don't like, consider that there is something more valuable than any earthly thing and that is the good qualities you carry in your own heart. If you feel that fate has dealt you a poor hand, remember the ultimate reward is not an earthly prize, the ultimate reward is spiritual, eternal. And your ability to cultivate spiritual qualities is within your own power, it does not depend on material goods, or social position, or the approval of anyone else.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 1 Month ago at 11/30/24 9:59 PM
Created 1 Month ago at 11/30/24 9:59 PM

Mantra of the Day

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
"Pride causes suffering, humility ends suffering."

(There are various shades of meaning associate with the word pride - in this case I mean "egoism" or "vanity")

I think this is a very concise statement of the gist Buddhism.

If you watch your mind you may notice that when you are experiencing dukkha and you let go of price and take on a more humble attitude, the suffering is lessened. When you experience this clearly, it becomes possible to reproduce it at will, and can be very helpful in letting go of attachments and aversions.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 25 Days ago at 12/26/24 10:11 PM
Created 25 Days ago at 12/26/24 9:26 PM

Mantra of the Day

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Mantra of the day:
Are you mindful or are you immersed? (1)

Are you aware or are you suppressing? (2)

Are you suffering or are not not suffering?

Is your ego involved or is your ego disengaged? (3)

Are you relaxed or are you tense?


You can use just the first line, or a subset of lines, or all of the lines as you prefer.

In all of this there is no intended judgement, just awareness of what is happening. The point is to become familiar with the contrast between the two states in each line, and also to be aware of any relatioships between states in different lines, (ie, there is usually ego involvement and tension in suffering). The mantra can also be useful to help you to be mindful if you are in a situation that is causing you strong emotions, is very stressful, or is very distracting.

If you are saying the mantra mindfully, you are probably mindful, aware, with the ego disengaged. You are probably not making new suffering, but you might still feel the leftover sense from any suffering you had been experiencing.

1) Immersed means your mind is wandering, you are lost in thought, you are carried away by thoughts, emotions, impulses, sensory experiences and senses of self and no-self. You are immersed in the world of your thoughts etc like when you watch a movie and get so involved you forget where you are. This is usually the ordinary state of consciousness for people who do not practice meditation and mindfulness. When you have a dream you think it's real, that is immersed, when you have a lucid dream you know you are dreaming, that is mindful. Mindful does not necessarily mean you have no thoughts etc, it means you know you have thoughts etc. like in a lucid dream, you are dreaming but you are not immersed.

2) Mindfulness involves not getting drawn in by thoughts, emotions, etc, (#1 above) and also not suppressing them. It means being aware of thoughts, emotions, etc without getting carried away and without suppressing. What that really means is something you can only understand by experience. How much of letting emotions flow is getting carried away, how much of not getting carried away is suppressing? 

3) While you are mindful, in the present moment, your ego is probably disengaged, you have abandoned identity view. Ego engagement or ego involvement means your thinking is in accordance with identity view, you are experiencing some type of ego based thinking etc. Feeling pride, or shame, wanting something for yourself or not wanting something for yourself, liking or disliking etc.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 23 Days ago at 12/29/24 2:56 PM
Created 23 Days ago at 12/29/24 2:56 PM

Identity-view and the fetter model.

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
According to the fetter model of awakening, stream entry occurs when one abandon's identity-view.

That seemed strange to me because if you are not subject to identity view you would not be bound by the other fetters, you should be an arhat, not a stream enterer. Yet some of the other fetters are said to fall away in stages, while identity view goes away all at once in the first stage of awakening.

But what I think explains this is that identity-view would be better understood as identity-belief.

Stream entry is when you stop believing in "identity view" but that doesn't mean all your old patterns of thinking and feeling that you reinforced over a lifetime go away. 

As Shinzen Young says:

https://www.lionsroar.com/on-enlightenment-an-interview-with-shinzen-young/
Sakkaya-ditthi [identity view] is the fundamental conviction that there is an entity, a thing inside us called a self. That conviction goes away forever. However, being momentarily caught in one’s sense of self, that happens to enlightened people over and over again, but less and less as enlightenment deepens and matures.

The conviction, "belief", goes away but you still get caught up in the old patterns.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 1:09 PM
Created 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 1:09 PM

RE: Identity-view and the fetter model.

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
There are two kinds of knowledge, factual knowledge, and procedural knowledge (knowledge of how to do something). Factual knowledge for example might be music theory. Procedural knowledge would be the knowledge of how to play the piano that you get from practicing. 

Identity view is factual knowledge. You can lose it from a temporary experience but the experience doesn't necessarily change what you know how to do. You are still bound by other fetters. The knowledge might be enough to tell you what you have to do, how to practice to fulfill the experience, but that isn't the same as having done the practice.

Mindfulness is what gives you the procedural knowledge. Mindfulness shows you how to be free from the fetters.

I think this explains Shinzen Young's observation that most of his student awaken gradually and sometimes don't know they've awakened.

They gain the procedural knowledge without the factual knowledge.  The effect of having the procedural knowledge is the same, awakening, freedom from fetters, but they don't necessarily understand or recognize what it is they have done. 
thumbnail
Papa Che Dusko, modified 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 6:41 PM
Created 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 6:41 PM

RE: Identity-view and the fetter model.

Posts: 3316 Join Date: 3/1/20 Recent Posts
I don't know that Im awakened and yet Im not Shinzen's student! 

I think you are gone sideways in all this "meditative stuff" and need to bring it back to the beginner's mind! emoticon "Don't know anything" emoticon 

​​​​​​​Best wishes Jim! 
Olivier S, modified 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 7:28 PM
Created 15 Days ago at 1/6/25 7:28 PM

RE: Identity-view and the fetter model.

Posts: 1014 Join Date: 4/27/19 Recent Posts
Knowledge VS know-how! Yes!
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 14 Days ago at 1/7/25 3:55 PM
Created 14 Days ago at 1/7/25 3:40 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
I am wondering if the way meditation and mindfulness is taught is deliberately inefficient to protect people from a sudden psychological shock that could damage mental health. For me, my current way of thinking seems very easy to understand....

Understanding anatta breaks the feedback loop that sustains emotions.

Most people already understand a lot about anatta.

People recognize that when they try to concentrate, they get distracted, they have stray thoughts, they don't control their mind, the don't control their thoughts.

They know they have unwanted emotions, they don't choose their emotions they don't control their emotions.

They have impulses, but where do the impulses come from, where do thoughts and emotions come from?

People have conflicting desires and impulses that work at cross purposes like wanting to lose weight while also wanting rich food.

So most people already understand much about annata.

Yet all the time they feel like they have free will and feel like they are thinking and doing things, they feel like they are in control.

But a person may also understand the feeling of agency is just another feeling that arises from unconscious process, like happiness, or the feeling of warm sunlight, or a sore back.

When you understand the feeling of agency is just like any other feeling, that it doesn't mean you actually have agency, then you know thoughts and emotions and impulses are not yours. You don't really choose them or deliberately create them, they just appear in consciousness from who knows where. And you don't choose your actions.

You know that psychological suffering (unpleasant emotions and cravings) is caused by thoughts but the thoughts are not yours and the suffering is not yours. You don't take them seriously, you don't buy into the story they are telling you about reality because they are not reality, they are just thoughts.

Emotions are sustained by feedback loops, when you know they are not yours, you don't engage in the thinking that sustains the emotions, the emotions just arise and fade without causing much trouble.

I suppose the hard part is accepting that the feeling of agency is just another feeling arising from unconscious processes and recognizing and accepting the implications of that. 

Right view is the first step in the eightfold path. I think meditation and mindfulness tend to be portrayed as more important than right view. It seems to me that right view is really the centerpiece and meditation and mindfulness are useful in support of right view. Meditation can calm the mind so that you can observe the truth of anatta, you can observe that you get distracted when you try to concentrate, that emotions and impulses arise into consciousness from unconscious processes unasked for and uninvited etc. Mindfulness in daily life is useful because it helps you actualize what you know about anatta, to see all day long that every thought, every emotion, every impulse, every action, every sensory experience, every sense of self or noself, is not "yours" it arises from unconscious processes.
thumbnail
Papa Che Dusko, modified 14 Days ago at 1/7/25 7:27 PM
Created 14 Days ago at 1/7/25 7:27 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 3316 Join Date: 3/1/20 Recent Posts
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 12 Days ago at 1/8/25 9:49 PM
Created 12 Days ago at 1/8/25 9:47 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
When something happens that upsets us it is often because we have some idea that this is "bad". But where did that idea come from? A lot of the time it is because we learned it from someone else when we were a small child. Or we believe other people will think it is bad and we care about what other people will think. So the idea that is at the root of our being upset is very often someone else's idea that we have adopted and forgot that it wasn't originally our idea. But if you can see what the idea is that is causing you to be upset in a situation, and see that it isn't really your idea, then it is not necessary to be upset. Your idea can be that you want to be non-attached, undisturbed in any situation. If you see that anything else is not your idea, it's someone else's idea, then you will be more non-attached and less disturbed.

What is more important, believing what other people expect you to believe, being upset when other people expect you to be upset, or being free and undisturbed?

I find this is very effective on "hot-button" issues. Those are often psychologically related to how we have interacted with other people in the past, They are very often caused by other people's ideas not our own ideas, and if you can see that you are reacting according to what other people expect and not what you really want, the issues become less "hot". It's easy to see that you are not reacting the way you want to, but seeing how you are influenced by other people's ideas can be harder and that is really an important part of being able to let go.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 2:17 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 1:46 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
This is why they say awakening is a perceptual change, like the picture that can look like a duck or a rabbit, or the picture that can look like a young girl or an old woman. You already know everything you need to know about anatta. You just have to see it in a different way so that it cuts through all attachments and aversions, so you see the aggregates aren't you or yours, so you see your body, your thoughts emotions impulses etc are not you or yours, your possessions aren't really you or yours. etc. You can't find anything that you could call a self. So you see your attachments and aversions are not yours, they are not your choice and you don't have to accept them, you don't have to buy into them because you see the source of attachments and aversions is not you.

You don't have to be unhappy, you don't have to be happy, you don't have to be awakened, you don't have to "suffer" (not claiming perfection is or isn't possible, just trying to get a point across). Neither attachments nor aversions are "yours". There is nothing to attain.

(Happy or unhappy is determined by brain chemicals which are not yours - not necessarily something you consciously control.)

Mediation and mindfulness help you see it this way. Calm the mind so you can observe it in action, then observe that activity of the mind to see how it works.

Jim Smith
I am wondering if the way meditation and mindfulness is taught is deliberately inefficient to protect people from a sudden psychological shock that could damage mental health. For me, my current way of thinking seems very easy to understand....

Understanding anatta breaks the feedback loop that sustains emotions.

Most people already understand a lot about anatta.

People recognize that when they try to concentrate, they get distracted, they have stray thoughts, they don't control their mind, the don't control their thoughts.

They know they have unwanted emotions, they don't choose their emotions they don't control their emotions.

They have impulses, but where do the impulses come from, where do thoughts and emotions come from?

People have conflicting desires and impulses that work at cross purposes like wanting to lose weight while also wanting rich food.

So most people already understand much about annata.

Yet all the time they feel like they have free will and feel like they are thinking and doing things, they feel like they are in control.

But a person may also understand the feeling of agency is just another feeling that arises from unconscious process, like happiness, or the feeling of warm sunlight, or a sore back.

When you understand the feeling of agency is just like any other feeling, that it doesn't mean you actually have agency, then you know thoughts and emotions and impulses are not yours. You don't really choose them or deliberately create them, they just appear in consciousness from who knows where. And you don't choose your actions.

You know that psychological suffering (unpleasant emotions and cravings) is caused by thoughts but the thoughts are not yours and the suffering is not yours. You don't take them seriously, you don't buy into the story they are telling you about reality because they are not reality, they are just thoughts.

Emotions are sustained by feedback loops, when you know they are not yours, you don't engage in the thinking that sustains the emotions, the emotions just arise and fade without causing much trouble.

I suppose the hard part is accepting that the feeling of agency is just another feeling arising from unconscious processes and recognizing and accepting the implications of that. 

Right view is the first step in the eightfold path. I think meditation and mindfulness tend to be portrayed as more important than right view. It seems to me that right view is really the centerpiece and meditation and mindfulness are useful in support of right view. Meditation can calm the mind so that you can observe the truth of anatta, you can observe that you get distracted when you try to concentrate, that emotions and impulses arise into consciousness from unconscious processes unasked for and uninvited etc. Mindfulness in daily life is useful because it helps you actualize what you know about anatta, to see all day long that every thought, every emotion, every impulse, every action, every sensory experience, every sense of self or noself, is not "yours" it arises from unconscious processes.
thumbnail
Chris M, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 2:19 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 2:19 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 5578 Join Date: 1/26/13 Recent Posts
I'd call awakening a phase change in perception.
thumbnail
Papa Che Dusko, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 3:11 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 3:11 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 3316 Join Date: 3/1/20 Recent Posts
My possessions are not really me or mine, and yet if my children are attacked I will fight back to the death if necessary. Hm ... Is this clinging? Or maybe awakening has nothing to do with one protecting one's property? 
thumbnail
Chris M, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 4:41 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 4:41 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 5578 Join Date: 1/26/13 Recent Posts
Awakening leaves you human, so of course you're gonna protect your family and property. I don't know where the fantasy that awakening changes you from human to whatever, but it's really pernicious fantasy bullshit.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 6:25 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 6:25 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
I've said many times in posts on this forum that being non-attached doesn't mean you ignore problems, it means you can respond with reason and compasson rather than selfish emotions. If I had to qualify everything I put in every post I would have to post a book length treatise every time I posted anything. It would not be practical. 
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 6:46 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 6:45 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Awakening doesn't eliminate compassion, often it increases compassion. When someone is not attached to their self, they are often are willing to do more (even risk more) for others.
thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 7:07 PM
Created 11 Days ago at 1/10/25 7:07 PM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
https://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipitaka/sn/sn22/sn22.059.than.html

Pañcavaggi Sutta: Five Brethren
(aka: Anatta-lakkhana Sutta: The Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic)
...

"And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful, subject to change as: 'This is mine. This is my self. This is what I am'?"

"No, lord."

"Thus, monks, any form whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every form is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 'This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.'

"Any feeling whatsoever...

"Any perception whatsoever...

"Any fabrications whatsoever...

"Any consciousness whatsoever that is past, future, or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or sublime; far or near: every consciousness is to be seen as it actually is with right discernment as: 'This is not mine. This is not my self. This is not what I am.'

"Seeing thus, the well-instructed disciple of the noble ones grows disenchanted with form, disenchanted with feeling, disenchanted with perception, disenchanted with fabrications, disenchanted with consciousness. Disenchanted, he becomes dispassionate. Through dispassion, he is fully released. With full release, there is the knowledge, 'Fully released.' He discerns that 'Birth is ended, the holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for this world.'"

thumbnail
Jim Smith, modified 10 Days ago at 1/11/25 4:47 AM
Created 10 Days ago at 1/11/25 4:47 AM

RE: Identity-view and the fetter model.

Posts: 1830 Join Date: 1/17/15 Recent Posts
Papa Che Dusko
I don't know that Im awakened and yet Im not Shinzen's student! 

I think you are gone sideways in all this "meditative stuff" and need to bring it back to the beginner's mind! emoticon "Don't know anything" emoticon 

​​​​​​​Best wishes Jim! 


There are many different opinions among people who consider themselves Buddhists and that is one of the great things that separates Buddhism from other religions, the tolerance of most of its followers. I don't know why you would try to discourage me from a form of practice that as been so phenomenally helpful to me, I am not going to give it up. If you don't like the way I practice Buddhism you don't have to read my practice log.

It can be hard to tell what someone is expressing on an internet post so maybe if I knew you personally I would see things differently ... but your gushing friendliness comes across as sanctimonious sarcasm ... and I suggest you consider whether you are really trying to be friendly and help me, or what seems more likely to me, that your are offended by something I wrote somewhere and are angry at me because of that. Maybe you should look inward and see if there is something you need to let go of.
thumbnail
Papa Che Dusko, modified 10 Days ago at 1/11/25 10:15 AM
Created 10 Days ago at 1/11/25 10:15 AM

RE: Jim Smith Practice Log #4

Posts: 3316 Join Date: 3/1/20 Recent Posts
Its the desire that "once Im awake no bad thing will happen to me, like ever" meaning that clinging to possessions will create desire, and aversion towards something that might be taking these away from me, hence not having a good awakened day anymore! emoticon emoticon emoticon So the best thing would be not to feel a thing, like be numb as a tranquilized horse! emoticon emoticon emoticon 

Breadcrumb