True or false - Discussion
True or false
True or false | Wet Paint | 7/20/09 7:26 AM |
RE: True or false | Wet Paint | 7/20/09 7:37 AM |
RE: True or false | Jackson Wilshire | 7/20/09 9:00 AM |
RE: True or false | Wet Paint | 7/20/09 9:28 AM |
Wet Paint, modified 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 7:26 AM
Created 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 7:26 AM
True or false
Posts: 22924 Join Date: 8/6/09 Recent Posts
Author: telecaster
Forum: Daniel's Practice Hut
To "get it done" it is significantly more important to know the nature of experience than whether or not that experience is pleasing, preferred, or desirable?
Forum: Daniel's Practice Hut
To "get it done" it is significantly more important to know the nature of experience than whether or not that experience is pleasing, preferred, or desirable?
Wet Paint, modified 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 7:37 AM
Created 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 7:37 AM
RE: True or false
Posts: 22924 Join Date: 8/6/09 Recent Posts
Author: garyrh
I am not sure of the difference between knowing the nature of experience and whether or not it is pleasing, preferred or desireable. Generally you don't want to be caught in content, so staying with the sensate helps here.
I am not sure of the difference between knowing the nature of experience and whether or not it is pleasing, preferred or desireable. Generally you don't want to be caught in content, so staying with the sensate helps here.
Jackson Wilshire, modified 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 9:00 AM
Created 14 Years ago at 7/20/09 9:00 AM
RE: True or false
Posts: 443 Join Date: 5/6/09 Recent Posts
If what you're asking is, "From an insight point of view, is it better to give preference to observing the universal characteristics of phenomena rather than simply finding experiences that I find pleasant and dwelling in them?" than the answer is a resounding Yes!
If that's not what you're asking, please clarify :-)
~Jackson
If that's not what you're asking, please clarify :-)
~Jackson