Two Questions on Intention and Metta

thumbnail
PP, modifié il y a 10 années at 25/06/13 08:34
Created 10 années ago at 25/06/13 08:34

Two Questions on Intention and Metta

Publications: 376 Date d'inscription: 21/03/12 Publications Récentes
- Should intentions be noted as thoughts? That is, non-verbal decisions such as changing the focus of attention. E.g. that decisions may be triggered by pleasantness/un-pleasantness. I notice a lot of these intentions while sitting.

- Is Metta part of Consciousness? You can have metta sensations, metta feeling-tones, metta-emotions and metta-thoughts. But many yogis describe a deep sense of gratitude after obtaining paths. Is Metta only a fabrication of the mind, like Jhanas, or something to be unveiled as an ultimate feature of Consciousness/Void/Tao/Whatever?
thumbnail
fivebells , modifié il y a 10 années at 25/06/13 10:45
Created 10 années ago at 25/06/13 10:45

RE: Two Questions on Intention and Metta

Publications: 563 Date d'inscription: 25/02/11 Publications Récentes
Yes, it is important to note intentions. Stable attention is really only possible if you maintain appropriate intention.

Yes, Metta is a fabrication. However, it is one the mind naturally inclines to after first path, when the malleability of fabrications is understood, and Metta is seen as a pleasant and useful state of mind. I think this may be the reason it's presented as intrinsic to undefiled consciousness in Mahayana (at least the Tibetan Karma Kagyu Mahayana which I learned.)
thumbnail
PP, modifié il y a 10 années at 25/06/13 15:59
Created 10 années ago at 25/06/13 15:59

RE: Two Questions on Intention and Metta

Publications: 376 Date d'inscription: 21/03/12 Publications Récentes
Great short answers Fivebells! Thank you very much.