Direct vs indirect Acceptance and the three characteristics + equanimity

thumbnail
bernd the broter,修改在7 年前。 at 17-3-8 上午9:50
Created 11 年 ago at 13-4-4 下午12:10

Direct vs indirect Acceptance and the three characteristics + equanimity

帖子: 376 加入日期: 12-6-13 最近的帖子
[deleted because nonsense]
thumbnail
fivebells ,修改在11 年前。 at 13-4-4 下午1:23
Created 11 年 ago at 13-4-4 下午1:23

RE: Direct vs indirect Acceptance and the three characteristics + equa

帖子: 563 加入日期: 11-2-25 最近的帖子
bernd the broter:
But now I'm rather coming to the conclusion that this is just a small part of what acceptance is. In MCTB it says that acceptance is a necessary requirement to enter equanimity. But I DID enter equanimity several times (and am currently in it) but I'm certainly not accepting of my experience here and now.

So what does it all mean? Is acceptance just another skill (like equanimity, insight, metta, ...) which needs special training?
If so, how is it done?


Acceptance is equanimity-as-a-skill, maybe with some metta thrown in. It can happen as a result of insight practice, but it's a hard way to procced when you have that kind of anxiety coming up.

The fact that you experienced equanimity-as-an-insight-stage in one setting does not mean you have developed equnamity-as-a-skill to the extent you need for all circumstances in your life. For circumstances which cause anxiety, it is probably easier to first develop metta for those circumstances and the experience of the anxiety. I find that provides the stability necessary to do the insight work.

面包屑导航