How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

thumbnail
Simon T, modified 11 Years ago at 4/4/13 9:29 PM
Created 11 Years ago at 4/4/13 9:29 PM

How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

Posts: 383 Join Date: 9/13/11 Recent Posts
From the magazine Psychology Tomorrow:

Within American Buddhism, the heart of this new transparency calls itself “Pragmatic Dharma.” The influential Buddhist Geeks podcast and conference is at the center of it. For the past few years, in popular interviews with dozens of scientists and teachers, they talk openly about different aspects of the awakening process, including frank testimonials of their own enlightenment experiences. This is a culture of learning and experimenting and exploring together. The Geeks believe – as do I – that the reticence and secrecy around spiritual transformation is no longer helpful or productive.


Part 1

Part 2
thumbnail
tom moylan, modified 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 3:58 PM
Created 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 3:58 PM

RE: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

Posts: 896 Join Date: 3/7/11 Recent Posts
excellent!
thumbnail
PP, modified 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 8:34 PM
Created 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 8:34 PM

RE: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

Posts: 376 Join Date: 3/21/12 Recent Posts
Nice read indeed!
thumbnail
chris mc, modified 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 10:47 PM
Created 11 Years ago at 4/5/13 10:47 PM

RE: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

Posts: 57 Join Date: 5/31/12 Recent Posts
One day in a public talk, with Young translating (Young began his monastic training at Mount Kōya south of Osaka and speaks fluent Japanese), the Rōshi asked an unusual question, “Do you know what the number one is?” Before the baffled audience could respond, he answered, “The number one is that which has the number zero as its content.” He went on, “Do you know what the number two is?” and again answered his own question, “The number two is that which has the number one as its content. Do you now what the number three is?” He continued in this vein, and as he did, Young, something of a math geek, had a revelation.

The Rōshi was articulating a fundamental dynamic of consciousness, one no scientist has yet reported, but has been described in slightly different language by Buddhists for over two thousand years. In the Rōshi’s way of seeing things, each sensory moment emerges when an empty source (Zero) polarizes into an expansive force and a contractive force. Between them, these two powers shape each nanosecond of perception. Again and again they mutually cancel and reunite, pulsing sensory reality into existence, creating ever-richer states of Zero that experienced meditators can learn to observe and even to ride (Young once told me this accounts for the bouncy vitality and spontaneity of some Zen monks).

Young realized the Rōshi’s exposition was remarkably similar to the modern foundation of mathematics known as “set theory.” And yet the Rōshi knew nothing of math – his 19th century education was essentially feudal. When Young pointed out this similarity, there was a long pause before his teacher eventually replied, in an unimpressed Zen deadpan, “Ahh… so the mathematicians have seen that far, eh?”



awesome.
This Good Self, modified 11 Years ago at 4/6/13 6:54 AM
Created 11 Years ago at 4/6/13 6:54 AM

RE: How Understanding the Process of Enlightenment Could Change Science

Posts: 946 Join Date: 3/9/10 Recent Posts
I hadn't seen that word "cessation" used before in here.

Self one moment, no self the next = cessation?

No levels to pass through?

Breadcrumb